First off, I doubt you’ve done any real research, otherwise, you would KNOW that Elites have been calling for World Government for centuries. Every tyrant they have put money behind, from Napoleon to Hitler, has called for World Government and NWO. You are also assuming that the Globalists have a RATIONAL reason for forcing World Government. It may be that they are just wildly vicious people. Ever thought of that?

Centralization of power is not about money, or even politics. It is about PSYCHOLOGY. The goal is to manipulate the masses into EXCEPTING central authority as a necessity, which it is not. Centralization of Government also renders all Sovereign Constitutions null and void. Just look into the European Union and how much Europeans despise it. The Goal is ULTIMATE CONTROL, which they do not have under the current system. We can still overthrow them anytime we like if the come completely out in the open.

"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England … (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
- Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton, quote from “Tragedy and Hope”, 1966

"The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton, quote from “Tragedy and Hope”, 1966

///////Justgood
I noticed you ignored the first quote, which is typical. I don’t think you have any interest in the concrete truth, why else would you ignore all the evidence that doesn’t support your preconceived notion? And no, I did not "Misunderstand" where you were coming from. Anyone else is welcome to look through my early posts. You will find Justgood there brashly rejecting all the facts and attacking anyone who brings up the NWO.

You see, Justgood is using a strategy that the Elites will be using more and more very soon. First, they called anyone who brought up the NWO a "nutcase". Now, since they are bringing their plans out in the open, they CHANGE THE DYNAMIC.

They’ll openly talk about the NWO, but they try to manipulate the DEFINITION of it. They’ll say its just an "economic agreement" or some other nonsense. Just remember folks, they used to call us crazy for talking about the New World Order, now they openly speak about it in the Wall Street Journal. The goal is ONE WORLD RULE, as Carroll Quigley admitted to in the quote above.

//////Justgood
You still ignored the quote. What YOU think the elites NEED is really irrelevant, because THEY openly call for World Government. Whether or not they NEED it is also irrelevant because they have admitted they WANT it. I’m treating you as hostile because numerous times in the past you have attacked other people for talking about the NWO. You also admit that you are a socialist, which doesn’t make your supposed stance against the NWO very viable. I’m supposed to believe that you have suddenly "come to your senses"? LOL! I think not. I think you are pretending to be anti-NWO while trying to manipulate aspects of the discussion away from reality. Why not make your previous answers open to everyone, Justgood, so we can all see how anti-NWO you are?

/////You continue to ignore the quote because it destroys your entire premise. If the Elites don’t need Global Government then why are they openly calling for it? And I’m sorry my point went straight over your head, but I can only dumb it down so much for you. Also, joining your contacts does not necessarily give me access to your older postings. Again, make them available for viewing to everyone and put your money where your mouth is. You’re not interested in real discussion, you’re only interested in RATIONALIZING a situation which has no rational foundation, in order to obscure its root importance. The Nazis did something similar……..

BTW, here’s one long winded answer from Justgood on how there is "No outside group of men trying to influence world events":

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AplnXqWZQEbJxx3zXKh1oSrty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20081202001841AAxU7kV&show=7#profile-info-gy3dR9ewaa

"All these conspiracy theories assume inaccurately that (a) the US political system contains a democratic "essence" blocked by outside forces, and (b) oppression is basically a matter of subjective actions by individuals or groups, not objective structures of power. These assumptions are not marginal, "paranoid" beliefs-they are ordinary, mainstream beliefs that reflect the individualism, historical denial, and patriotic illusions of mainstream liberal thought."

So, I guess now you’ve……..changed your mind…..?
References :

Money is not the END, it is the MEANS. The same can be said of war. It IS all going somewhere. These people do not intend to use War as a geopolitical tool -forever-. EDIT: Albert Pike’s "three world wars" had a theoretical objective. He never mentioned a fourth (that I am aware of…).

Have you heard of the Iron Mountain Report? Whether real or a hoax, the question posed to this think tank was "how can we maintain Anglo-American dominance in a future devoid of war?" The consensus was that they would need a common threat (i.e. environmental) that the world could unite against.

Secondly, they don’t already have "total power" (it’s quite the contrary – they seem to be losing it!)

"Total power" is what they’ve always been after, that’s what they are using their money and their wars to get. If they HAD total control, then all their wealth could not buy them any more influence, could it? Then it would become worthless to them.

Moreover, if they DID already enjoy total global control, most of us would probably be dead right now, and we certainly wouldn’t be having this discussion.

Also, a "World Financial Order" …IS… a "world government" ! (for all intents and purposes)! If you attended the first day of NWO 101, then you should know the influence that central banking systems hold over national governments, and you should know that the difference between "World Financial Order" and "world government" is purely semantic.

"They can have the total control without calling it a one world government or ending nation states, can’t they?" EXACTLY. That is exactly what I expect them to do. They’re not going to just come out and announce one day: "Welcome to the New World Order! Here’s your new flag and your new money." Yes, nations will continue to exist (in name only) long after global governance has been established. That is a NECESSITY, or the people would obviously revolt.

Global dominance has been attempted by force before, and it did not succeed. Conquest by deception seems to be working far better, so far… and I expect the deception to continue, at least until the globalist institutions have become so strong that they can no longer be challenged.

So, no, there is nothing at all contradictory about the idea of using war and economic manipulation to steer the geopolitical landscape gradually towards "global governance" or whatever you choose to call it. It’s really the only way to accomplish this.

When describing the level of control the globalist elite actually have over world events, I commonly use the metaphor of trying to steer a huge ocean liner at high speed in choppy seas.

I hope that answers your question.
References :
EDIT: Good, I’m glad this is making sense. I agree with most of what you’re saying here. I have been telling people the very same thing about the Amero… I doubt there will ever be a currency called the "Amero" used in the US because it would simply be too difficult to make the people accept it. It is far more likely, IMO, that they will skip the "NAU" currency and go straight to a global one. Americans will keep the same "dollar" (same name, look and feel) only now it will be pegged to a new supranational reserve currency, whose value is set by a new world bank, which I believe will be proposed soon.

Good chat.

We can all be pretty confident that there have always been secret meetings here and there wherein attendees discussed world domination. Heck, it starts in the treehouse.

Some result in bigger blobs of arrogant control than others and, with today’s technology, it’s possible to go REALLY large.

But, fear not. Rarely do such sick-minded, voracious beasts play well together because each one wants it all and they want it now. When they don’t get what they want, in-fighting leads to the demise of the regime.

As for the ties to the Book of Revelations, my faith tells me to read it for myself with no preconceived notions. I did. And I don’t see the prophecies espoused by popular authors nearly as clearly as I see the profits of their authorship.

…
References :

If you do not believe in the New World Order or the goal of the global elite, I have a difficult time believing in you. Do you believe in God? What about Satan?

Wars are just a method used historically by the Empire to achieve their current objectives; the lives of the pathetic masses mean nothing to them; and besides, a lot more money can be made from selling implements for warfare to fund their conspiracy.

If you purchased gasoline during the last twelve months and from the price fixing at the gas pumps, you did not notice the petroleum companies not really competing for their share of the market, you must be as blind as a Bush.
References :
A dumb mass.